C   O   M   P   A   S   S N a v i g a t i n g   a n   I n c r e a s i n g l y   C o m p l e x   W o r l d

C e n t e r   f o r   C o m p l e x    A d a p t i v e   S o c i o t e c h n o l o g i c a l   S y s t e m s

 

 

About COMPASS

People

  Research

     Education

 Publications

Home

 Complexity

  Contact Us

 

Contact Us

Dr. Ali Mostashari

Director, COMPASS and Associate Professor (Research)

School of Systems and Enterprises

Stevens Institute of Technology

619 Babbio Building, Castle Point on the Hudson

Hoboken, NJ 07030

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Architecting the Cognitive Enterprise: Towards Learning and Self-Adaptive Organizational Networks

Cite as: Mostashari, A.” Architecting the Cognitive Enterprise: Towards Learning and Self-Adaptive Organizational Networks”, COMPASS Whitepaper 2009-01, Stevens Institute of Technology, February 2009

Dr. Ali Mostashari

The ability of an enterprise to adjust the allocation of its resources and the type or magnitude of its outputs to rapidly changing external and internal needs and requirements is critical. It hinges on the capacity of the enterprise to sense and/or forecast the pertinent changes, contextualize the information, make timely decisions that affect resource allocation and product configuration, monitor the impact of these decisions and learn for improved future decision-making.

There have been many studies on the concept of Agile Enterprises, which can anticipate and respond to changes in the market in a rapid manner [1-3]. However the Agile approach puts the emphasis of response to change to human centered deliberations on the initial design of enterprise structures and processes to allow for agility in response to change. Also most of the literature is limited to heuristics and qualitative frameworks that cannot be robustly applied, tested and validated for different enterprises under a variety of conditions.

The goal of this research is to explore the concept of “Cognitive Enterprises” as a new paradigm for architecting learning and self-adaptive enterprises that can dynamically adjust their resources, configuration and outputs to meet the constantly changing external and internal needs and requirements. The term Cognitive refers to the ability of the enterprise to “learn to adapt its behavior based on experience”. Hence, Cognitive Enterprise relies on autonomous, intelligent observation, trade-off analysis and action accompanied by learning to allow an Enterprise to increasingly become better at reconfiguring itself in response to change.   

 

The Cognitive Enterprise

The concept of Cognitive Enterprise is based on the “Cognitive Radio” paradigm, developed by one of the co-PIs of this research (Dr. Joseph Mitola III) in 1999 [4], and expanded and refined in subsequent years by him and other researchers [5-11]. Cognitive Radio was defined as “radios that can sense their environment, including spectrum use and the presence of other such radios and then adapt their transmission/reception to avoid interference could implement a dynamic control method for solving the interference problem.”[6]

The potential of a “Cognitive” approach for Enterprises is significant. It heralds the evolution of an enterprise that can sense its environment, including other competing and collaborating enterprises and adjust its resource allocations, internal configuration and outputs in a way that optimizes its value delivery. The study of Cognitive Enterprises also builds on insights from the fields of cognitive linguistics, game theory and enterprise architecture to explore an interdisciplinary approach to architecting enterprises that are capable of learning and self adaptation. As such it represents a new analytic approach to fundamentally defining enterprises based on their ability to dynamically respond to change.

 Based on the insights from the Cognitive Radio Literature [5], we define a Cognitive Enterprise as having the following capabilities:

1.     Sensing individual internal and external changes

2.     Perceiving the overall picture that these changes represent

3.     Associating the new situation with past experienced situations and acting accordingly if similar

4.     Planning various alternatives in response to the change within a given response timeline

5.     Choosing course of action that seems best suited to the situation

6.     Taking Action by adjusting resources and outcomes to meet new needs and requirements

7.     Monitoring and Learning from the impact of capabilities 1-6

From the definition it follows that every enterprise could exhibit these capabilities in different degrees. Each of these capabilities is used in an Enterprise process that directly corresponds to it. The chain of the seven resulting processes constitutes the full cognitive process cycle for the Enterprise for any given set of changes. The focus of this Cognitive Enterprise research is on cyber-enabled close-to-real time usage of these capabilities in order to meet rapid and consecutive changes in needs and requirements.

 

In structuring this research, we build the groundwork for future research to address the following fundamental issues with regards to Cognitive Enterprises:

·       What different levels of cognition can exist within enterprises and how can they be measured/ evaluated?

·       How do enterprises sense and perceive changes in their environment? Who or what within the organization does the sensing and perceiving?

·       How is information from the sensing domain translated into/understood as contextual information that supports resource and output decisions within the enterprise?

·       To what extent is the decision-making performed by a cognitive data network and when does the social network (the network of the enterprise’s human resources) enter the decision-making dynamics?

·       How do the different sensing agents within the enterprise negotiate resource usage?

·       What types of enterprise architectures best support Cognitive Enterprises?

·       How do Cognitive Enterprises learn from previous experiences?

 

Even a partial answer to these questions will constitute a significant contribution to our understanding of how organizations respond to change.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Copyright © 2008-2009   COMPASS- The Center for Complex Adaptive Sociotechnological Systems     School of Systems and Enterprises         Stevens Institute of Technology